Function and Form?

[JDMTypeR]

What style you like to qo for?

[EJ7patg]

bump

[jd1]

I like both I would need two vehicle to go with one with Function & one with Form B)

[shooktd]

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=341483385886643&set=a.189044927797157.49252.185311478170502&type=1&theater

function and form.

[anthonyb5s4]

that red s2k is beautiful

[Bwahhhh]

form all day

[jdmjunkie9753]

I definitely love the look of "stanced" cars, but I personally choose function over form.

Having some real suspension to get a mean "squat", and at the same time be putting power to the ground is where its at.

[jdm'ej8coupe]

bump

[ej1 sleeper]

I definitely love the look of "stanced" cars, but I personally choose function over form.

Having some real suspension to get a mean "squat", and at the same time be putting power to the ground is where its at.

this^

[LS/Vtec]

function>form. hard parking ftl. I built my car so I can drive it. Not to go dumb slow to dodge all the bumps n shit in the road. Thats no fun.

[kbrown!]

Nothing wrong with a low car but come on sometimes j
It looks stupid and extreme camber is gay as fuck. I like function IMO

[BITO]

Everyone will say both but its not too practical plus 80% of ppl cant afford one or the other properly let alone both

[turboegbeast]

form

[daddieyankee32]

Form>>>

[BB DC294 NHCT]

I'm all about function. When I had my integra, i bought skunk2 front and rear camber kits. I did the alignment myself at job. The camber was set slightly negative but still reading within specs. Function then a little bit of from.